DiscGolf vs Fruityvice
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
DiscGolf vs Fruityvice: common questions
Which is more reliable, DiscGolf or Fruityvice?
Both are neck-and-neck — DiscGolf and Fruityvice each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.
Which is faster, DiscGolf or Fruityvice?
DiscGolf has the lower median latency in our checks — DiscGolf responds in 762 ms versus Fruityvice at 951 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do DiscGolf and Fruityvice need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — DiscGolf is callable with no signup, and Fruityvice is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call DiscGolf and Fruityvice from the browser?
Only DiscGolf is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Fruityvice needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.
Are DiscGolf and Fruityvice free for commercial use?
DiscGolf has unclear commercial terms, and Fruityvice has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.