shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

DiscGolf vs Foodish

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIDiscGolfHEALTHY90FoodishDYING53
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%27.5%
Uptime · 30d100%11.7%
P50 · ms762250
P95 · ms2153760
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseFree to use with attribution (per response metadata)Unverified (open-source)
Free tierFree — public endpoints, no keyFree — no key
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

DiscGolf vs Foodish: common questions

Which is more reliable, DiscGolf or Foodish?

On our scheduled checks, DiscGolf leads on measured uptime — DiscGolf at 100% versus Foodish at 27.5% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, DiscGolf or Foodish?

Foodish has the lower median latency in our checks — DiscGolf responds in 762 ms versus Foodish at 250 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do DiscGolf and Foodish need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — DiscGolf is callable with no signup, and Foodish is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call DiscGolf and Foodish from the browser?

Only DiscGolf is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Foodish needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are DiscGolf and Foodish free for commercial use?

DiscGolf has unclear commercial terms, and Foodish has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.