DiscGolf vs FoodData Central

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%98.0%
Uptime · 30d100%96.7%
P50 · ms7621726
P95 · ms21533453
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseFree to use with attribution (per response metadata)Unverified
Free tierFree — public endpoints, no keyFree tier — API key may be required for production
Rate limitUnpublished10 req/window · 9 remaining
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

DiscGolf vs FoodData Central: common questions

Which is more reliable, DiscGolf or FoodData Central?

On our scheduled checks, DiscGolf leads on measured uptime — DiscGolf at 100% versus FoodData Central at 98.0% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, DiscGolf or FoodData Central?

DiscGolf has the lower median latency in our checks — DiscGolf responds in 762 ms versus FoodData Central at 1726 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do DiscGolf and FoodData Central need an API key?

DiscGolf needs no key, while FoodData Central requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for DiscGolf first.

Can I call DiscGolf and FoodData Central from the browser?

Yes — both DiscGolf and FoodData Central send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are DiscGolf and FoodData Central free for commercial use?

DiscGolf has unclear commercial terms, and FoodData Central has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.