DexPaprika vs VALR

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d99.02%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms430696
P95 · ms22023273
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

DexPaprika vs VALR: common questions

Which is more reliable, DexPaprika or VALR?

On our scheduled checks, VALR leads on measured uptime — DexPaprika at 99.02% versus VALR at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, DexPaprika or VALR?

DexPaprika has the lower median latency in our checks — DexPaprika responds in 430 ms versus VALR at 696 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do DexPaprika and VALR need an API key?

DexPaprika needs no key, while VALR requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for DexPaprika first.

Can I call DexPaprika and VALR from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call DexPaprika and VALR from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are DexPaprika and VALR free for commercial use?

DexPaprika has unclear commercial terms, and VALR has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.