shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Dev.to vs IFTTT

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIDev.toHEALTHY77IFTTTHEALTHY92
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms328682
P95 · ms10681262
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Dev.to vs IFTTT: common questions

Which is more reliable, Dev.to or IFTTT?

Both are neck-and-neck — Dev.to and IFTTT each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Dev.to or IFTTT?

Dev.to has the lower median latency in our checks — Dev.to responds in 328 ms versus IFTTT at 682 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Dev.to and IFTTT need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Dev.to is callable with no signup, and IFTTT is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Dev.to and IFTTT from the browser?

Only Dev.to is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. IFTTT needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Dev.to and IFTTT free for commercial use?

Dev.to has unclear commercial terms, and IFTTT has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.