DeFi Llama vs Sharpe

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d99.02%98.0%
Uptime · 30d100%96.7%
P50 · ms6791239
P95 · ms27573358
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

DeFi Llama vs Sharpe: common questions

Which is more reliable, DeFi Llama or Sharpe?

On our scheduled checks, DeFi Llama leads on measured uptime — DeFi Llama at 99.02% versus Sharpe at 98.0% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, DeFi Llama or Sharpe?

DeFi Llama has the lower median latency in our checks — DeFi Llama responds in 679 ms versus Sharpe at 1239 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do DeFi Llama and Sharpe need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — DeFi Llama is callable with no signup, and Sharpe is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call DeFi Llama and Sharpe from the browser?

Yes — both DeFi Llama and Sharpe send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are DeFi Llama and Sharpe free for commercial use?

DeFi Llama has unclear commercial terms, and Sharpe has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.