DeFi Llama vs DexPaprika

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d98.3%99.44%
Uptime · 30d96.7%100%
P50 · ms330167
P95 · ms43551156
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

DeFi Llama vs DexPaprika: common questions

Which is more reliable, DeFi Llama or DexPaprika?

On our scheduled checks, DexPaprika leads on measured uptime — DeFi Llama at 98.3% versus DexPaprika at 99.44% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, DeFi Llama or DexPaprika?

DexPaprika has the lower median latency in our checks — DeFi Llama responds in 330 ms versus DexPaprika at 167 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do DeFi Llama and DexPaprika need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — DeFi Llama is callable with no signup, and DexPaprika is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call DeFi Llama and DexPaprika from the browser?

Only DeFi Llama is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. DexPaprika needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are DeFi Llama and DexPaprika free for commercial use?

DeFi Llama has unclear commercial terms, and DexPaprika has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.