dead-drop vs FilterLists

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d99.02%98.0%
Uptime · 30d98.3%96.7%
P50 · ms722357
P95 · ms12991813
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — no key required
Rate limit100 req/window · 100 remaining · resets 1783513841Unpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

dead-drop vs FilterLists: common questions

Which is more reliable, dead-drop or FilterLists?

On our scheduled checks, dead-drop leads on measured uptime — dead-drop at 99.02% versus FilterLists at 98.0% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, dead-drop or FilterLists?

FilterLists has the lower median latency in our checks — dead-drop responds in 722 ms versus FilterLists at 357 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do dead-drop and FilterLists need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — dead-drop is callable with no signup, and FilterLists is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call dead-drop and FilterLists from the browser?

Only dead-drop is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. FilterLists needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are dead-drop and FilterLists free for commercial use?

dead-drop has unclear commercial terms, and FilterLists has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.