ddownload vs UrlBae

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%1.0%
Uptime · 30d100%0.0%
P50 · ms3651158
P95 · ms7921158
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

ddownload vs UrlBae: common questions

Which is more reliable, ddownload or UrlBae?

On our scheduled checks, ddownload leads on measured uptime — ddownload at 100% versus UrlBae at 1.0% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, ddownload or UrlBae?

ddownload has the lower median latency in our checks — ddownload responds in 365 ms versus UrlBae at 1158 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do ddownload and UrlBae need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — ddownload uses an API key and UrlBae uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call ddownload and UrlBae from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call ddownload and UrlBae from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are ddownload and UrlBae free for commercial use?

ddownload has unclear commercial terms, and UrlBae has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.