Datasette vs Warnely

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%90.2%
Uptime · 30d100%83.3%
P50 · ms293334
P95 · ms8921375
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublished100 req/window · 99 remaining · resets 60
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Datasette vs Warnely: common questions

Which is more reliable, Datasette or Warnely?

On our scheduled checks, Datasette leads on measured uptime — Datasette at 100% versus Warnely at 90.2% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Datasette or Warnely?

Datasette has the lower median latency in our checks — Datasette responds in 293 ms versus Warnely at 334 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Datasette and Warnely need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Datasette is callable with no signup, and Warnely is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Datasette and Warnely from the browser?

Only Datasette is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Warnely needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Datasette and Warnely free for commercial use?

Datasette has unclear commercial terms, and Warnely has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.