shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

DataScreenIQ vs Hunter

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIDataScreenIQNEW—HunterNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

DataScreenIQ vs Hunter: common questions

Which is more reliable, DataScreenIQ or Hunter?

On our scheduled checks, Hunter leads on measured uptime — DataScreenIQ at —% versus Hunter at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do DataScreenIQ and Hunter need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — DataScreenIQ uses an API key and Hunter uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call DataScreenIQ and Hunter from the browser?

Only DataScreenIQ is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Hunter needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are DataScreenIQ and Hunter free for commercial use?

DataScreenIQ has unclear commercial terms, and Hunter has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.