Data Dragon API vs DiscGolf

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms153762
P95 · ms14282153
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedFree to use with attribution (per response metadata)
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — public endpoints, no key
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Data Dragon API vs DiscGolf: common questions

Which is more reliable, Data Dragon API or DiscGolf?

Both are neck-and-neck — Data Dragon API and DiscGolf each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Data Dragon API or DiscGolf?

Data Dragon API has the lower median latency in our checks — Data Dragon API responds in 153 ms versus DiscGolf at 762 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Data Dragon API and DiscGolf need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Data Dragon API is callable with no signup, and DiscGolf is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Data Dragon API and DiscGolf from the browser?

Yes — both Data Dragon API and DiscGolf send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Data Dragon API and DiscGolf free for commercial use?

Data Dragon API has unclear commercial terms, and DiscGolf has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.