shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

CryptoLabel API vs VALR

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APICryptoLabel APIHEALTHY83VALRHEALTHY93
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d99.44%99.44%
Uptime · 30d100%98.3%
P50 · ms807405
P95 · ms36983273
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

CryptoLabel API vs VALR: common questions

Which is more reliable, CryptoLabel API or VALR?

Both are neck-and-neck — CryptoLabel API and VALR each measure 99.44% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, CryptoLabel API or VALR?

VALR has the lower median latency in our checks — CryptoLabel API responds in 807 ms versus VALR at 405 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do CryptoLabel API and VALR need an API key?

CryptoLabel API needs no key, while VALR requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for CryptoLabel API first.

Can I call CryptoLabel API and VALR from the browser?

Only CryptoLabel API is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. VALR needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are CryptoLabel API and VALR free for commercial use?

CryptoLabel API has unclear commercial terms, and VALR has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.