shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

CryptAPI vs Trading View

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APICryptAPINEW—Trading ViewNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useyesunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree API; provider takes ~1% fee per forwarded paymentFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

CryptAPI vs Trading View: common questions

Which is more reliable, CryptAPI or Trading View?

On our scheduled checks, Trading View leads on measured uptime — CryptAPI at —% versus Trading View at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do CryptAPI and Trading View need an API key?

CryptAPI needs no key, while Trading View requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for CryptAPI first.

Can I call CryptAPI and Trading View from the browser?

Only CryptAPI is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Trading View needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are CryptAPI and Trading View free for commercial use?

CryptAPI allows commercial use on its free tier, and Trading View has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.