shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

CryptAPI vs Sharpe

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APICryptAPINEW—SharpeNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useyesunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree API; provider takes ~1% fee per forwarded paymentFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

CryptAPI vs Sharpe: common questions

Which is more reliable, CryptAPI or Sharpe?

On our scheduled checks, Sharpe leads on measured uptime — CryptAPI at —% versus Sharpe at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do CryptAPI and Sharpe need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — CryptAPI is callable with no signup, and Sharpe is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call CryptAPI and Sharpe from the browser?

Only CryptAPI is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Sharpe needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are CryptAPI and Sharpe free for commercial use?

CryptAPI allows commercial use on its free tier, and Sharpe has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.