shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

CryptAPI vs DexPaprika

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APICryptAPINEW—DexPaprikaNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useyesunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree API; provider takes ~1% fee per forwarded paymentFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

CryptAPI vs DexPaprika: common questions

Which is more reliable, CryptAPI or DexPaprika?

On our scheduled checks, DexPaprika leads on measured uptime — CryptAPI at —% versus DexPaprika at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do CryptAPI and DexPaprika need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — CryptAPI is callable with no signup, and DexPaprika is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call CryptAPI and DexPaprika from the browser?

Only CryptAPI is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. DexPaprika needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are CryptAPI and DexPaprika free for commercial use?

CryptAPI allows commercial use on its free tier, and DexPaprika has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.