CryptAPI vs DeFi Llama

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%99.02%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms496679
P95 · ms11032757
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useyesunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree API; provider takes ~1% fee per forwarded paymentFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

CryptAPI vs DeFi Llama: common questions

Which is more reliable, CryptAPI or DeFi Llama?

On our scheduled checks, CryptAPI leads on measured uptime — CryptAPI at 100% versus DeFi Llama at 99.02% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, CryptAPI or DeFi Llama?

CryptAPI has the lower median latency in our checks — CryptAPI responds in 496 ms versus DeFi Llama at 679 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do CryptAPI and DeFi Llama need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — CryptAPI is callable with no signup, and DeFi Llama is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call CryptAPI and DeFi Llama from the browser?

Yes — both CryptAPI and DeFi Llama send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are CryptAPI and DeFi Llama free for commercial use?

CryptAPI allows commercial use on its free tier, and DeFi Llama has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.