Cross Universe vs PotterDB

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms40525
P95 · ms4481193
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified (fan project)Unverified (data derived from Harry Potter Fandom, CC BY-SA)
Free tierFree — no keyFree — no key
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Cross Universe vs PotterDB: common questions

Which is more reliable, Cross Universe or PotterDB?

Both are neck-and-neck — Cross Universe and PotterDB each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Cross Universe or PotterDB?

Cross Universe has the lower median latency in our checks — Cross Universe responds in 40 ms versus PotterDB at 525 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Cross Universe and PotterDB need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Cross Universe is callable with no signup, and PotterDB is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Cross Universe and PotterDB from the browser?

Yes — both Cross Universe and PotterDB send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Cross Universe and PotterDB free for commercial use?

Cross Universe has unclear commercial terms, and PotterDB has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.