shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Court Rules vs Warnely

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APICourt RulesDYING37WarnelyDYING73
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d0.0%62.8%
Uptime · 30d0.0%3.3%
P50 · ms—342
P95 · ms—1554
Authnonenone
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not published
Rate limit100 req/window · 99 remaining · resets 60
In directory since2026-10-042026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Court Rules vs Warnely: common questions

Which is more reliable, Court Rules or Warnely?

On our scheduled checks, Warnely leads on measured uptime — Court Rules at 0.0% versus Warnely at 62.8% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do Court Rules and Warnely need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Court Rules is callable with no signup, and Warnely is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Court Rules and Warnely from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Court Rules and Warnely from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are Court Rules and Warnely free for commercial use?

Court Rules has unclear commercial terms, and Warnely has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.