Court Rules vs Umeå Open Data

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d0.0%93.3%
Uptime · 30d0.0%98.3%
P50 · ms—1151
P95 · ms—4863
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseVaries by dataset (municipal open data; see portal)
Free tierFree — open data portal, no key
Rate limit1000 req/window · 999 remaining · resets 2026-07-09 00:00:00+00:00
In directory since2026-10-042026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Court Rules vs Umeå Open Data: common questions

Which is more reliable, Court Rules or Umeå Open Data?

On our scheduled checks, Umeå Open Data leads on measured uptime — Court Rules at 0.0% versus Umeå Open Data at 93.3% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do Court Rules and Umeå Open Data need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Court Rules is callable with no signup, and Umeå Open Data is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Court Rules and Umeå Open Data from the browser?

Only Umeå Open Data is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Court Rules needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Court Rules and Umeå Open Data free for commercial use?

Court Rules has unclear commercial terms, and Umeå Open Data has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.