ColorMagic vs xColors

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d83.9%100%
Uptime · 30d51.7%100%
P50 · ms267444
P95 · ms30701161
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

ColorMagic vs xColors: common questions

Which is more reliable, ColorMagic or xColors?

On our scheduled checks, xColors leads on measured uptime — ColorMagic at 83.9% versus xColors at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, ColorMagic or xColors?

ColorMagic has the lower median latency in our checks — ColorMagic responds in 267 ms versus xColors at 444 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do ColorMagic and xColors need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — ColorMagic is callable with no signup, and xColors is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call ColorMagic and xColors from the browser?

Only xColors is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. ColorMagic needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are ColorMagic and xColors free for commercial use?

ColorMagic has unclear commercial terms, and xColors has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.