ColorMagic vs ShotOG

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%99.02%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms399179
P95 · ms2920418
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

ColorMagic vs ShotOG: common questions

Which is more reliable, ColorMagic or ShotOG?

On our scheduled checks, ColorMagic leads on measured uptime — ColorMagic at 100% versus ShotOG at 99.02% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, ColorMagic or ShotOG?

ShotOG has the lower median latency in our checks — ColorMagic responds in 399 ms versus ShotOG at 179 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do ColorMagic and ShotOG need an API key?

ColorMagic needs no key, while ShotOG requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for ColorMagic first.

Can I call ColorMagic and ShotOG from the browser?

Only ColorMagic is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. ShotOG needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are ColorMagic and ShotOG free for commercial use?

ColorMagic has unclear commercial terms, and ShotOG has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.