ColorMagic vs Shoof Aflam

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%99.02%
Uptime · 30d100%98.3%
P50 · ms399539
P95 · ms29201312
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

ColorMagic vs Shoof Aflam: common questions

Which is more reliable, ColorMagic or Shoof Aflam?

On our scheduled checks, ColorMagic leads on measured uptime — ColorMagic at 100% versus Shoof Aflam at 99.02% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, ColorMagic or Shoof Aflam?

ColorMagic has the lower median latency in our checks — ColorMagic responds in 399 ms versus Shoof Aflam at 539 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do ColorMagic and Shoof Aflam need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — ColorMagic is callable with no signup, and Shoof Aflam is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call ColorMagic and Shoof Aflam from the browser?

Only ColorMagic is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Shoof Aflam needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are ColorMagic and Shoof Aflam free for commercial use?

ColorMagic has unclear commercial terms, and Shoof Aflam has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.