ColorMagic vs Openwhyd

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d83.9%97.2%
Uptime · 30d51.7%100%
P50 · ms267141
P95 · ms30701350
Authnonenone
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — no key required
Rate limitUnpublished100 req/window · 99 remaining · resets 60
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

ColorMagic vs Openwhyd: common questions

Which is more reliable, ColorMagic or Openwhyd?

On our scheduled checks, Openwhyd leads on measured uptime — ColorMagic at 83.9% versus Openwhyd at 97.2% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, ColorMagic or Openwhyd?

Openwhyd has the lower median latency in our checks — ColorMagic responds in 267 ms versus Openwhyd at 141 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do ColorMagic and Openwhyd need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — ColorMagic is callable with no signup, and Openwhyd is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call ColorMagic and Openwhyd from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call ColorMagic and Openwhyd from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are ColorMagic and Openwhyd free for commercial use?

ColorMagic has unclear commercial terms, and Openwhyd has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.