ColorMagic vs iTunes Search

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d83.9%9.6%
Uptime · 30d51.7%13.8%
P50 · ms26799
P95 · ms3070293
Authnonenone
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedRetry-After: 29s
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

ColorMagic vs iTunes Search: common questions

Which is more reliable, ColorMagic or iTunes Search?

On our scheduled checks, ColorMagic leads on measured uptime — ColorMagic at 83.9% versus iTunes Search at 9.6% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, ColorMagic or iTunes Search?

iTunes Search has the lower median latency in our checks — ColorMagic responds in 267 ms versus iTunes Search at 99 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do ColorMagic and iTunes Search need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — ColorMagic is callable with no signup, and iTunes Search is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call ColorMagic and iTunes Search from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call ColorMagic and iTunes Search from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are ColorMagic and iTunes Search free for commercial use?

ColorMagic has unclear commercial terms, and iTunes Search has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.