Coinnect vs paralelo.bo

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d98.0%100%
Uptime · 30d98.3%100%
P50 · ms1419593
P95 · ms37271499
AuthapiKeynone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished (60s cache stated)
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Coinnect vs paralelo.bo: common questions

Which is more reliable, Coinnect or paralelo.bo?

On our scheduled checks, paralelo.bo leads on measured uptime — Coinnect at 98.0% versus paralelo.bo at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Coinnect or paralelo.bo?

paralelo.bo has the lower median latency in our checks — Coinnect responds in 1419 ms versus paralelo.bo at 593 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Coinnect and paralelo.bo need an API key?

paralelo.bo needs no key, while Coinnect requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for paralelo.bo first.

Can I call Coinnect and paralelo.bo from the browser?

Only paralelo.bo is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Coinnect needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Coinnect and paralelo.bo free for commercial use?

Coinnect has unclear commercial terms, and paralelo.bo has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.