shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

CoinDCX vs CryptAPI

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APICoinDCXNEW—CryptAPINEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
AuthapiKeynone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearyes
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree API; provider takes ~1% fee per forwarded payment
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

CoinDCX vs CryptAPI: common questions

Which is more reliable, CoinDCX or CryptAPI?

On our scheduled checks, CryptAPI leads on measured uptime — CoinDCX at —% versus CryptAPI at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do CoinDCX and CryptAPI need an API key?

CryptAPI needs no key, while CoinDCX requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for CryptAPI first.

Can I call CoinDCX and CryptAPI from the browser?

Only CryptAPI is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. CoinDCX needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are CoinDCX and CryptAPI free for commercial use?

CoinDCX has unclear commercial terms, and CryptAPI allows commercial use on its free tier. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.