shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Coffee vs Longevity World Cup

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APICoffeeHEALTHY89Longevity World CupHEALTHY85
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d99.02%99.02%
Uptime · 30d98.3%98.3%
P50 · ms698767
P95 · ms28263677
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — no API keyFree — no key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Coffee vs Longevity World Cup: common questions

Which is more reliable, Coffee or Longevity World Cup?

Both are neck-and-neck — Coffee and Longevity World Cup each measure 99.02% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Coffee or Longevity World Cup?

Coffee has the lower median latency in our checks — Coffee responds in 698 ms versus Longevity World Cup at 767 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Coffee and Longevity World Cup need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Coffee is callable with no signup, and Longevity World Cup is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Coffee and Longevity World Cup from the browser?

Only Longevity World Cup is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Coffee needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Coffee and Longevity World Cup free for commercial use?

Coffee has unclear commercial terms, and Longevity World Cup has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.