CloudConvert vs ScrapingDog
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
CloudConvert vs ScrapingDog: common questions
Which is more reliable, CloudConvert or ScrapingDog?
Both are neck-and-neck — CloudConvert and ScrapingDog each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.
Which is faster, CloudConvert or ScrapingDog?
ScrapingDog has the lower median latency in our checks — CloudConvert responds in 433 ms versus ScrapingDog at 195 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do CloudConvert and ScrapingDog need an API key?
Both ask you to authenticate — CloudConvert uses an API key and ScrapingDog uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.
Can I call CloudConvert and ScrapingDog from the browser?
Only ScrapingDog is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. CloudConvert needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.
Are CloudConvert and ScrapingDog free for commercial use?
CloudConvert has unclear commercial terms, and ScrapingDog has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.