shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

CloudConvert vs Gcore CDN

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APICloudConvertNEW—Gcore CDNNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — key may be requiredFree tier — API key may be required for production
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

CloudConvert vs Gcore CDN: common questions

Which is more reliable, CloudConvert or Gcore CDN?

On our scheduled checks, Gcore CDN leads on measured uptime — CloudConvert at —% versus Gcore CDN at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do CloudConvert and Gcore CDN need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — CloudConvert uses an API key and Gcore CDN uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call CloudConvert and Gcore CDN from the browser?

Only Gcore CDN is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. CloudConvert needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are CloudConvert and Gcore CDN free for commercial use?

CloudConvert has unclear commercial terms, and Gcore CDN has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.