ClinicalTrials.gov vs TourneyRadar
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
ClinicalTrials.gov vs TourneyRadar: common questions
Which is more reliable, ClinicalTrials.gov or TourneyRadar?
On our scheduled checks, ClinicalTrials.gov leads on measured uptime — ClinicalTrials.gov at 99.02% versus TourneyRadar at 98.0% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, ClinicalTrials.gov or TourneyRadar?
ClinicalTrials.gov has the lower median latency in our checks — ClinicalTrials.gov responds in 243 ms versus TourneyRadar at 2911 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do ClinicalTrials.gov and TourneyRadar need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — ClinicalTrials.gov is callable with no signup, and TourneyRadar is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call ClinicalTrials.gov and TourneyRadar from the browser?
Yes — both ClinicalTrials.gov and TourneyRadar send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.
Are ClinicalTrials.gov and TourneyRadar free for commercial use?
ClinicalTrials.gov has unclear commercial terms, and TourneyRadar has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.