Climate FieldView Platform APIs vs Meteorologisk Institutt

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms
P95 · ms
AuthapiKeynone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearyes
Data licenseUnverifiedCC BY 4.0 / NLOD (Norwegian Licence for Open Government Data)
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree, no key; requires identifying User-Agent
Rate limitUnpublishedThrottled; identify via User-Agent and respect caching headers (per docs)
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Climate FieldView Platform APIs vs Meteorologisk Institutt: common questions

Which is more reliable, Climate FieldView Platform APIs or Meteorologisk Institutt?

On our scheduled checks, Meteorologisk Institutt leads on measured uptime — Climate FieldView Platform APIs at —% versus Meteorologisk Institutt at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do Climate FieldView Platform APIs and Meteorologisk Institutt need an API key?

Meteorologisk Institutt needs no key, while Climate FieldView Platform APIs requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Meteorologisk Institutt first.

Can I call Climate FieldView Platform APIs and Meteorologisk Institutt from the browser?

Only Meteorologisk Institutt is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Climate FieldView Platform APIs needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Climate FieldView Platform APIs and Meteorologisk Institutt free for commercial use?

Climate FieldView Platform APIs has unclear commercial terms, and Meteorologisk Institutt allows commercial use on its free tier. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.