Cisco Spark vs TimeAPI.io

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms16081040
P95 · ms29363967
AuthapiKeynone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Cisco Spark vs TimeAPI.io: common questions

Which is more reliable, Cisco Spark or TimeAPI.io?

Both are neck-and-neck — Cisco Spark and TimeAPI.io each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Cisco Spark or TimeAPI.io?

TimeAPI.io has the lower median latency in our checks — Cisco Spark responds in 1608 ms versus TimeAPI.io at 1040 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Cisco Spark and TimeAPI.io need an API key?

TimeAPI.io needs no key, while Cisco Spark requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for TimeAPI.io first.

Can I call Cisco Spark and TimeAPI.io from the browser?

Yes — both Cisco Spark and TimeAPI.io send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Cisco Spark and TimeAPI.io free for commercial use?

Cisco Spark has unclear commercial terms, and TimeAPI.io has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.