Cisco Spark vs The Calendar

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms1608588
P95 · ms29363550
AuthapiKeynone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified (US federal list per 5 U.S.C. § 6103)
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree, no auth (per site)
Rate limitUnpublishedNone stated (site advertises no rate limit)
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Cisco Spark vs The Calendar: common questions

Which is more reliable, Cisco Spark or The Calendar?

Both are neck-and-neck — Cisco Spark and The Calendar each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Cisco Spark or The Calendar?

The Calendar has the lower median latency in our checks — Cisco Spark responds in 1608 ms versus The Calendar at 588 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Cisco Spark and The Calendar need an API key?

The Calendar needs no key, while Cisco Spark requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for The Calendar first.

Can I call Cisco Spark and The Calendar from the browser?

Yes — both Cisco Spark and The Calendar send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Cisco Spark and The Calendar free for commercial use?

Cisco Spark has unclear commercial terms, and The Calendar has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.