Cisco Spark vs JobDataLake

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms1608336
P95 · ms29361419
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Cisco Spark vs JobDataLake: common questions

Which is more reliable, Cisco Spark or JobDataLake?

Both are neck-and-neck — Cisco Spark and JobDataLake each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Cisco Spark or JobDataLake?

JobDataLake has the lower median latency in our checks — Cisco Spark responds in 1608 ms versus JobDataLake at 336 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Cisco Spark and JobDataLake need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — Cisco Spark uses an API key and JobDataLake uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call Cisco Spark and JobDataLake from the browser?

Yes — both Cisco Spark and JobDataLake send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Cisco Spark and JobDataLake free for commercial use?

Cisco Spark has unclear commercial terms, and JobDataLake has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.