shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Cisco Spark vs Footer Year Update

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APICisco SparkNEW—Footer Year UpdateNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
AuthapiKeynone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Cisco Spark vs Footer Year Update: common questions

Which is more reliable, Cisco Spark or Footer Year Update?

On our scheduled checks, Footer Year Update leads on measured uptime — Cisco Spark at —% versus Footer Year Update at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do Cisco Spark and Footer Year Update need an API key?

Footer Year Update needs no key, while Cisco Spark requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Footer Year Update first.

Can I call Cisco Spark and Footer Year Update from the browser?

Only Cisco Spark is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Footer Year Update needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Cisco Spark and Footer Year Update free for commercial use?

Cisco Spark has unclear commercial terms, and Footer Year Update has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.