Chocomilk API vs Watchmode

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d31.4%100%
Uptime · 30d6.7%100%
P50 · ms990554
P95 · ms15261050
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedWatchmode terms
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — 1,000 req/month
Rate limit60 req/window · 59 remaining · resets 601,000 req/month (free tier)
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Chocomilk API vs Watchmode: common questions

Which is more reliable, Chocomilk API or Watchmode?

On our scheduled checks, Watchmode leads on measured uptime — Chocomilk API at 31.4% versus Watchmode at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Chocomilk API or Watchmode?

Watchmode has the lower median latency in our checks — Chocomilk API responds in 990 ms versus Watchmode at 554 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Chocomilk API and Watchmode need an API key?

Chocomilk API needs no key, while Watchmode requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Chocomilk API first.

Can I call Chocomilk API and Watchmode from the browser?

Only Watchmode is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Chocomilk API needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Chocomilk API and Watchmode free for commercial use?

Chocomilk API has unclear commercial terms, and Watchmode has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.