shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Chocomilk API vs Wallhaven

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIChocomilk APIDYING46WallhavenDYING82
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d31.4%82.4%
Uptime · 30d6.7%71.7%
P50 · ms990625
P95 · ms15263981
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — key may be required
Rate limit60 req/window · 59 remaining · resets 6045 req/window · 44 remaining
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Chocomilk API vs Wallhaven: common questions

Which is more reliable, Chocomilk API or Wallhaven?

On our scheduled checks, Wallhaven leads on measured uptime — Chocomilk API at 31.4% versus Wallhaven at 82.4% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Chocomilk API or Wallhaven?

Wallhaven has the lower median latency in our checks — Chocomilk API responds in 990 ms versus Wallhaven at 625 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Chocomilk API and Wallhaven need an API key?

Chocomilk API needs no key, while Wallhaven requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Chocomilk API first.

Can I call Chocomilk API and Wallhaven from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Chocomilk API and Wallhaven from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are Chocomilk API and Wallhaven free for commercial use?

Chocomilk API has unclear commercial terms, and Wallhaven has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.