shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Chocomilk API vs ThronesApi

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIChocomilk APIDYING46ThronesApiHEALTHY83
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d31.4%97.1%
Uptime · 30d6.7%95.0%
P50 · ms990890
P95 · ms15264593
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limit60 req/window · 59 remaining · resets 60Unpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Chocomilk API vs ThronesApi: common questions

Which is more reliable, Chocomilk API or ThronesApi?

On our scheduled checks, ThronesApi leads on measured uptime — Chocomilk API at 31.4% versus ThronesApi at 97.1% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Chocomilk API or ThronesApi?

ThronesApi has the lower median latency in our checks — Chocomilk API responds in 990 ms versus ThronesApi at 890 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Chocomilk API and ThronesApi need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Chocomilk API is callable with no signup, and ThronesApi is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Chocomilk API and ThronesApi from the browser?

Only ThronesApi is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Chocomilk API needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Chocomilk API and ThronesApi free for commercial use?

Chocomilk API has unclear commercial terms, and ThronesApi has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.