Chocomilk API vs MCU Countdown

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d31.4%100%
Uptime · 30d6.7%100%
P50 · ms990400
P95 · ms15261444
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified (movie data from TMDB)
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limit60 req/window · 59 remaining · resets 60Unpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Chocomilk API vs MCU Countdown: common questions

Which is more reliable, Chocomilk API or MCU Countdown?

On our scheduled checks, MCU Countdown leads on measured uptime — Chocomilk API at 31.4% versus MCU Countdown at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Chocomilk API or MCU Countdown?

MCU Countdown has the lower median latency in our checks — Chocomilk API responds in 990 ms versus MCU Countdown at 400 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Chocomilk API and MCU Countdown need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Chocomilk API is callable with no signup, and MCU Countdown is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Chocomilk API and MCU Countdown from the browser?

Only MCU Countdown is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Chocomilk API needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Chocomilk API and MCU Countdown free for commercial use?

Chocomilk API has unclear commercial terms, and MCU Countdown has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.