shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Chocomilk API vs Discogs

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIChocomilk APIDYING46DiscogsDEAD0
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d31.4%8.8%
Uptime · 30d6.7%0.0%
P50 · ms990329
P95 · ms1526459
Authnonenone
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limit60 req/window · 59 remaining · resets 60Unpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Chocomilk API vs Discogs: common questions

Which is more reliable, Chocomilk API or Discogs?

On our scheduled checks, Chocomilk API leads on measured uptime — Chocomilk API at 31.4% versus Discogs at 8.8% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Chocomilk API or Discogs?

Discogs has the lower median latency in our checks — Chocomilk API responds in 990 ms versus Discogs at 329 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Chocomilk API and Discogs need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Chocomilk API is callable with no signup, and Discogs is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Chocomilk API and Discogs from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Chocomilk API and Discogs from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are Chocomilk API and Discogs free for commercial use?

Chocomilk API has unclear commercial terms, and Discogs has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.