Chinese Text Project vs Quran

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms40126
P95 · ms1322694
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree (higher limits with a free API key)Free — limits not published
Rate limitFair-use; raised with an API keyUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Chinese Text Project vs Quran: common questions

Which is more reliable, Chinese Text Project or Quran?

Both are neck-and-neck — Chinese Text Project and Quran each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Chinese Text Project or Quran?

Quran has the lower median latency in our checks — Chinese Text Project responds in 401 ms versus Quran at 26 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Chinese Text Project and Quran need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Chinese Text Project is callable with no signup, and Quran is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Chinese Text Project and Quran from the browser?

Yes — both Chinese Text Project and Quran send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Chinese Text Project and Quran free for commercial use?

Chinese Text Project has unclear commercial terms, and Quran has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.