shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Chess.com vs Pokémon TCG

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIChess.comHEALTHY98Pokémon TCGDYING32
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d99.02%17.6%
Uptime · 30d98.3%15.0%
P50 · ms168797
P95 · ms6824419
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified (Pokémon IP)
Free tierFree — no API keyFree; no key ~1,000 req/day & 30/min, free key ~20,000 req/day (documented)
Rate limitSerial requests expected; no fixed cap publishedWithout key: ~30 req/min, 1,000 req/day (documented)
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Chess.com vs Pokémon TCG: common questions

Which is more reliable, Chess.com or Pokémon TCG?

On our scheduled checks, Chess.com leads on measured uptime — Chess.com at 99.02% versus Pokémon TCG at 17.6% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Chess.com or Pokémon TCG?

Chess.com has the lower median latency in our checks — Chess.com responds in 168 ms versus Pokémon TCG at 797 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Chess.com and Pokémon TCG need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Chess.com is callable with no signup, and Pokémon TCG is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Chess.com and Pokémon TCG from the browser?

Only Chess.com is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Pokémon TCG needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Chess.com and Pokémon TCG free for commercial use?

Chess.com has unclear commercial terms, and Pokémon TCG has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.