Chess.com vs Astroworld

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms
P95 · ms
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified (Minecraft game data; Mojang content)
Free tierFree — no API keyFree — no key
Rate limitSerial requests expected; no fixed cap published100 req/window · 99 remaining · resets 60
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Chess.com vs Astroworld: common questions

Which is more reliable, Chess.com or Astroworld?

On our scheduled checks, Astroworld leads on measured uptime — Chess.com at —% versus Astroworld at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do Chess.com and Astroworld need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Chess.com is callable with no signup, and Astroworld is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Chess.com and Astroworld from the browser?

Yes — both Chess.com and Astroworld send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Chess.com and Astroworld free for commercial use?

Chess.com has unclear commercial terms, and Astroworld has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.