CheapShark vs PlayerDB

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d95.1%100%
Uptime · 30d96.7%100%
P50 · ms197541
P95 · ms4894352
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — no keyFree, no API key
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

CheapShark vs PlayerDB: common questions

Which is more reliable, CheapShark or PlayerDB?

On our scheduled checks, PlayerDB leads on measured uptime — CheapShark at 95.1% versus PlayerDB at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, CheapShark or PlayerDB?

PlayerDB has the lower median latency in our checks — CheapShark responds in 1975 ms versus PlayerDB at 41 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do CheapShark and PlayerDB need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — CheapShark is callable with no signup, and PlayerDB is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call CheapShark and PlayerDB from the browser?

Yes — both CheapShark and PlayerDB send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are CheapShark and PlayerDB free for commercial use?

CheapShark has unclear commercial terms, and PlayerDB has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.