CheapShark API vs Eden

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d99.02%100%
Uptime · 30d98.3%100%
P50 · ms804475
P95 · ms2483926
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

CheapShark API vs Eden: common questions

Which is more reliable, CheapShark API or Eden?

On our scheduled checks, Eden leads on measured uptime — CheapShark API at 99.02% versus Eden at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, CheapShark API or Eden?

Eden has the lower median latency in our checks — CheapShark API responds in 804 ms versus Eden at 475 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do CheapShark API and Eden need an API key?

CheapShark API needs no key, while Eden requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for CheapShark API first.

Can I call CheapShark API and Eden from the browser?

Only Eden is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. CheapShark API needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are CheapShark API and Eden free for commercial use?

CheapShark API has unclear commercial terms, and Eden has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.