CheapShark API vs Currents

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d99.02%100%
Uptime · 30d98.3%100%
P50 · ms804586
P95 · ms24831165
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

CheapShark API vs Currents: common questions

Which is more reliable, CheapShark API or Currents?

On our scheduled checks, Currents leads on measured uptime — CheapShark API at 99.02% versus Currents at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, CheapShark API or Currents?

Currents has the lower median latency in our checks — CheapShark API responds in 804 ms versus Currents at 586 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do CheapShark API and Currents need an API key?

CheapShark API needs no key, while Currents requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for CheapShark API first.

Can I call CheapShark API and Currents from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call CheapShark API and Currents from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are CheapShark API and Currents free for commercial use?

CheapShark API has unclear commercial terms, and Currents has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.