CDNJS vs Yes-as-a-Service
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
CDNJS vs Yes-as-a-Service: common questions
Which is more reliable, CDNJS or Yes-as-a-Service?
On our scheduled checks, CDNJS leads on measured uptime — CDNJS at 100% versus Yes-as-a-Service at 98.0% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, CDNJS or Yes-as-a-Service?
CDNJS has the lower median latency in our checks — CDNJS responds in 281 ms versus Yes-as-a-Service at 557 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do CDNJS and Yes-as-a-Service need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — CDNJS is callable with no signup, and Yes-as-a-Service is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call CDNJS and Yes-as-a-Service from the browser?
Yes — both CDNJS and Yes-as-a-Service send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.
Are CDNJS and Yes-as-a-Service free for commercial use?
CDNJS has unclear commercial terms, and Yes-as-a-Service has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.