CDNJS vs ParlayAPI

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%87.5%
Uptime · 30d100%87.5%
P50 · ms155211
P95 · ms9361536
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified
Free tierFree and open, no key
Rate limitUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-10-04
operationalpartialdownno data

CDNJS vs ParlayAPI: common questions

Which is more reliable, CDNJS or ParlayAPI?

On our scheduled checks, CDNJS leads on measured uptime — CDNJS at 100% versus ParlayAPI at 87.5% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, CDNJS or ParlayAPI?

CDNJS has the lower median latency in our checks — CDNJS responds in 155 ms versus ParlayAPI at 211 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do CDNJS and ParlayAPI need an API key?

CDNJS needs no key, while ParlayAPI requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for CDNJS first.

Can I call CDNJS and ParlayAPI from the browser?

Only CDNJS is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. ParlayAPI needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are CDNJS and ParlayAPI free for commercial use?

CDNJS has unclear commercial terms, and ParlayAPI has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.