CDNJS vs Icanhazip
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
CDNJS vs Icanhazip: common questions
Which is more reliable, CDNJS or Icanhazip?
On our scheduled checks, CDNJS leads on measured uptime — CDNJS at 100% versus Icanhazip at 26.5% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, CDNJS or Icanhazip?
CDNJS has the lower median latency in our checks — CDNJS responds in 281 ms versus Icanhazip at 328 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do CDNJS and Icanhazip need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — CDNJS is callable with no signup, and Icanhazip is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call CDNJS and Icanhazip from the browser?
Yes — both CDNJS and Icanhazip send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.
Are CDNJS and Icanhazip free for commercial use?
CDNJS has unclear commercial terms, and Icanhazip has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.